Friday, March 12, 2010

Teflon as a graffiti deterrent/ solution

Self promotion, rebel statement
or just plain visual bullying?
What about Teflon as a protective layer for signs and wall surfaces that are frequently damaged by graffiti?
Teflon is usually used in non-stick cooking pans to protect the bottom of the pan from sticking to burnt food. Would you believe my wife and I have been testing paint properties when sprayed on old Teflon coated cooking pans and the results are worth exploring but not as good as you would think.

Paint applied to the sides of an old pan where the Teflon is the least damaged was the easiest place to get the test paint to come off... but it still took a bit of effort. Our target is to find an ease of paint release that would allow a high pressure hose to remove the graffiti paint without damaging the original surface. In practice this would allow a community owned tank truck to go around the neighborhood and power clean the the signs and damaged walls without the need for extensive manual work.

Why work on graffiti deterrents?
When I operate out of Australia, I work from a wonderful beach side town surrounded by wondrous natural beauty. That all comes to a jarring halt whenever I see that beauty marred by graffiti.

Ever since this problem really started to bother me I have been looking at various solutions.

For example a color matching system that allows people to place a sheet of white paper up against the grafitti damaged wall to get a color matched printout of paint color needed to paint over the graffiti.

Or on the other extreme a rental service that allows owners of buildings that have been frequently damaged by graffiti to cheaply rent surveillance material that is optimized to allow formal identification and laying of charges with the authorities.

Visual bullies?
School yard bullies are kids that throw their weight around, forcing their will on other kid's because they can get away with it and because its too hard for teachers to be watching them all the time. In my mind non commissioned grafitti-ing is visual bullying. They are pushing their ideas and self promotion on the other people in the community who pay for the signs and walls and buildings they abuse. Often they are selfish kids who just don't care about anyone else. How would they like it if people came into their homes and tagged their personal things or their cars?

Now.... got to get off the soapbox and get back to inventing.

Additional notes

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Uniloc vs Microsoft

Disclaimer: The following is gathered from public information and does not represent the personal opinion of Mr Ric Richardson. The information supplied is not a legal statement but simply a layman's summary of what has happened in the case in basic terms.
In 2003 Ric Richardson became aware of a possible infringement of the 216 patent by certain Microsoft products. Shortly after this Ric started working with Uniloc management and the firm of Mintz Levin to protect Uniloc's patent rights.

Latest news - current status
25th Feb 2010: At this time Ric is not aware of a date for the appeal however he is informed that Uniloc and Mintz Levin are steadily working towards securing an appeal court date.

The suit
At some time in 2003 Ric Richardson started noticing references to the way Microsoft's Software Activation Technology worked in web page references that related to large corporations that wanted to verify what information was and was not collected during the activation process. In Ric's mind this amounted to reasonable suspicion that Microsoft may be infringing his 216 patent. After that time Ric with the support of his team at Uniloc started working with legal representation to secure representation and file a suit.

Summary Judgement
After some years of preparation and exhaustive discovery Uniloc filed with the court to have their case heard. The judge, who was the judge who heard the eventual case in court decided to deliver summary judgement in favour of Microsoft citing that Uniloc did not have evidence to warrant taking Microsoft to court.
Appeal and reversal of Summary Judgement

As a result of the decision Uniloc appealed the decision and had the matter heard by the appeals court. Uniloc made two requests of the appeal court. Firstly to have the summary judgement reversed and that the judge be recused meaning that we requested that another judge be used to try the case.  The appeal court subsequently overruled the judge and reversed his decision citing that there was material fact submitted in our discovery that warranted a jury trial. However the decision to recuse the judge was not upheld and the same judge who had erroneously given Microsoft summary judgment was to try the case in court. Uniloc submitted in its appeal that the use of a summer intern that had worked at Microsoft may have affected the judges decision in his role as a technical adviser to the judge.

The court case and the Jury Verdict
After some weeks at trial a jury subsequently awarded Uniloc $388 million dollars excluding damages or interest. The jury also decided that the patent infringement was intentional. Under US law it is the judge that determines the damages and level of interest to be paid by the defendant.

The Judges Decision
After some months, the judge made the unusual decision to invoke his special privileges under the US law and reverse the jury verdict giving the case to Microsoft citing the reason that there was not valid evidentiary reason for the jury to reach their decision or for Uniloc to have won the case.

The Appeal
Uniloc fairly quickly decided to appeal this decision and are actively working with the court to secure an appeal court date.

Safe and Affordable Jetpack: Just $90,000

Just the thing to get into town... wonder if they make a 4 jet model?
Notice... standard gasoline and a half hour of fly time per tank. Of course this is not a Richo invention but every now and then I like to showcase really cool inventions by others here.

Sent to you by RicRicho via Google Reader:


via Gadget Lab by Charlie Sorrel on 3/9/10

martin-aircraft-jetpack-4For years, man has been trying to build a jetpack which would actually be safe and cheap enough to be used by anyone other than Lee Majors on the title sequence of The Fall Guy. It turns out that we've been doing it wrong. Instead of starting with a pack and adding on the jet, we should have torn the giant engines from a plane and strapped them to some poor schmuck. This is what the New Zealand Martin Aircraft Company did, resulting in the Martin Jetpack.
The jetpack is made from carbon fiber, with a touch of kevlar in the rotors, and generates 600 pounds of thrust. Because the center of gravity is below the "center of thrust" (a notional point between the engines), it is self-righting: If the pilot lets go of the controls, he hovers steadily in one spot. Unlike other sci-fi vehicles, the jetpack doesn't require plutonium or even garbage for power. Instead, it runs on ordinary gasoline, chugging down around 10 gallons per hour (a full tank of five gallons will give you half an hour of flight time, enough to get you to the office).
Martin's jetpack is classed as an ultralight aircraft, so you don't need a pilot's license fly it. Martin will force buyers to undergo training first, though. As its FAQ so rightly points out: "to attempt to fly any aircraft without professional instruction is extremely foolhardy." There are some safety features, though. If the engine dies, a parachute pops out like an airbag in a car, so the only thing you need worry about is crashing into passing planes.
Want one? Of course you do. Right now you're looking at a 12-month wait, and you'll have to pay 10 percent upfront, but at just shy of $90,000 — the same as a fancy sports car — it's actually a pretty good deal. And just imagine landing this thing on the forecourt of the local gas station.
The Martin Jetpack [Martin]
The Future Is Here: Jetpacks Now Commercially Available [Wired: Geek Dad]

Things you can do from here:

Main zkimmer patent now lodged as full patent

The main zkimmer patent is now lodged as a full application. For visitors with access it can be seen here:


Re:       U.S. Patent Application No. 12/247,165
Filed:          October 7, 2008
Title:           System and Method for Displaying Digital Editions of Periodicals and Publications
Applicant:    Ric B. Richardson
Assignee:    zkimmer Inc.
Our Ref:      70333-00002
Subject:      U.S. Publication No. US 2010/0002935


Ric, Sky:

The above-referenced U.S. patent application has published as Publication No. US 2010/0002935 on January 7, 2010.  Attached for your records is a copy of the publication.
We will keep you informed of further developments in this matter.  Please contact me if you have any questions. 
Thanks,
John

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Raising Capital and Business Building options

This article was written in preparation for a symposium covering capital raising choices and business building strategies. The following ideas are only that... my personal ideas based on my personal experience so please take that into consideration as you consider the ideas and principles I explain.


Start with the end in mind
Like all good business books I agree with the adage that goals must be clearly defined and realistic. One of my favorite business books is Business Corps a book of lessons from the US Marine Corp and one of its key concepts... the visualization and clear definition of the end state. Where you want to be.

But this is easier said than done. With options ranging from boot strapping and organic growth, to a fully fledged VC backed market entry to tapping into government business development and R&D assistance programs, it's hard to know what combination of approaches best suit your business and opportunity.

I wish I could give you real-life examples of the pros and cons of each approach and speak from experience, but I can't.

On the other hand I, like you, are looking at these same options for my own inventions and prospective businesses and can at least share with you my gut feelings and instinct on how to choose a good combination for a wide variety of businesses and opportunities.

This brings me back to the key thought "start with the end in mind". This is such an important step you need to bring all your emotional and logical resources together to make a good solid decision that has a good probability of success, requires some courage (which also makes it fun) but is also realistic.
So let's start the process

For your business to be a major success will it eventually have to be based overseas? Maybe in the US? Are you prepared to go there for a decade? How much investors money are you willing to spend to learn to be a CEO of your company? If you haven't done it before then don't presume it is something you will just get the hang of in time.

To help further clarify, I find that business success is the combination of three main elements.
  • A great idea or technology from determined founders
  • A great execution team that have done this kind of business before.
  • Money from quality investors
These three things are the core of success as far as I can see. The weaker the core idea, the harder it is to sell in turn making it hard to execute for even the best team with tons of money.

But a killer idea will die on the vine if the opportunity window passes while the founders try and learn how to build and run a business... and even with the most supportive investors who may have the deepest pockets you run risk of spending a lot of money and not getting anywhere.

My magic formula is this:
  • A strong new idea with a value that is readily appreciated by the target customer. The idea need not be commercialized but it has to be baked, not still in R&D.
  • A CEO who has sold something like this before. Someone who knows exactly who to sell to for how much and can build a business plan that is based on real experience.
  • An investment group that is familiar with the market you are entering and may even be known to the CEO so that the decision to move is fast and the confidence in the business plan is well founded and reasonable.
  • The next thing is to be realistic about your end goal, what we called earlier the "end state".

An example 
For example, you may have a health care technology that may have international market opportunities but you know in your heart that if you can get adoption in major hospitals in every state of Australia you will have executed your plan to your satisfaction.

Unless you have already sold some technology to every major hospital in Australia, I'd start looking for someone else who has. Beg, borrow and steal. Do whatever it takes to find, the guy... or gal who has been there before. 

Someone who knows how to deal with state health departments and hospital management.  This may sound slow but going off half cocked and trying to start market entry yourself will take much longer than you think and could quite possibly kill the opportunity.

Kill the opportunity? Yes. I am a firm believer in opportunity momentum. It's the magic that happens when great people work on a great idea and are backed by the right resources.It's happened to me before and now that I know what it feels like I'll never try and run my own company again.

So you find someone to lead your team to your goal and now you need funding. They may love your idea and your aspirations, but what do they want to get out of it? What does your CEO want to get out of it?

Isn't the goal for both your team and your investors to build the business and then cash out? Is it realistic to expect a market entry maestro to spend the rest of his or her days maintaining the business and for investors to be happy with a quarterly dividend?

How does everybody exit?

The answer to these questions is the reason why the most important question to answer regarding the end state is "How does everyone exit?" What does your CEO , your investors and your family want in terms of an exit?

When you get your head around this it completely changes your game plan. Put plainly:

Your end state, your ultimate goal is your exit strategy.

It sounds crass and capitalistic to some of you I know, but it is a reality. It is the only way to execute your plan, and the earlier you decide what you want to do the easier it will be to execute a good plan. So here are some options to consider.

Example Exit Options

IPO - not for the feint hearted. Almost certainly requires a stellar VC backed US market entry and you better have a killer product and be ready to live in the states for a decade.

Acquisition or Merger - Have three target acquirers in mind from day one. Know what they need and how not only your product but your business plan and execution will fit with them as you  get ready to put your self on the market.

Back in California I was privy to the antics of a couple of quintessential entrepreneurs called the Steelburg brothers. They had tea shirts printed up for their shareholder meetings with "Google, Yahoo or Microsoft?" printed on the back that everyone was encouraged to wear. I don't think there was any doubt as to what their exit strategy was. They subsequently sold to Google in record time.

So there you have it... I hope these ideas are helpful. But please remember these are only the personal findings of moderately successful inventor who dabbles in entrepreneurship.

Other articles you may find interesting:

About Ric: Overview

Ric Richardson (born May, 1962) is an Australian inventor, technologist and founder of Uniloc, the software company he started in 1992. Uniloc recently received worldwide attention when a jury in Rhode Island sided with the company against Microsoft in a patent infringement dispute.The judge subsequently overturned the jury's decision and the case is now going to the appeal court in the US. During his career at Uniloc, Ric has held the positions of Chairman, CEO and CTO, and remains one of the largest individual shareholders.

Ric left day-to-day activities at Uniloc to begin working as a full-time independent inventor in late 2007. Since that time Ric has worked on a small number of major technology projects as well as a diverse assortment of smaller projects. Major projects include Logarex which is an ambitious logarithmic compression technology that he hopes will radically reduce the size of all stored digital data by between 50-98%, and zkimmer, a digital document viewing technology that uses digital mapping engines to elegantly handle large numbers of photographic quality magazine and publication images.

Ric stepped down as chairman of Uniloc in early 2009 but continues to develop inventions for the company on a regular basis. 

When must PCT or WIPO patents be filed?

A few of the visitors to this blog have asked when is the latest you can file your PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) application. This is not legal advice and I request that you always check with a lawyer but according to this link...

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1800_1842.htm

... from the USPTO you have 12 months from your FULL national application to file your PCT application without losing your priority date.

So as far as I can tell this is how it is....

  • You have up to 12 months from when you first complete your invention to file a provisional.
  • Then you have 12 months from your provisional filing in which to file your full application (at least this is so in the US.
  • The according to the link above you have 12 months to file your PCT application.
Remeber your PCT application is only that... it is an application, NOT a patent in itself. All the PCT does is maintain a priority date while you explore in which individual countries you will proceed to do a full patent application. I have not researched the additional windows for each country but if you have got this far it is about time that you start using the services of a good international patent lawyer.

Ric's note: For such a common question I was surprised how long it took to find documentation on the subject... I kind of new this from experience but still it is something that should be readily available on the net or at least wikipedia.

Friday, March 5, 2010

View Australian Story Episode online Now - Updated

For a few months the online access to the ABC Australian Story episode featuring Ric Richardson has been restricted due to an ongoing legal situation regarding copyright for music used in the series.

As that issue nears resolution the Australian Story management has kindly re-established online access to the show which can be now viewed at:


Also on this page are links to the following videos:
  • Ric riding his dirt bike
  • Ric as a kid featured on a Johnny O'Keefe music video for Bandstand produced by his Dad and agrueably one of the first music video's made in Australia.
  • Background photos from the story
...

Sunday, February 28, 2010

The Tsunami watch

I was down Belongil beach this morning waiting to see if the Tsunami from Chile arrives... it hadn't by 9.10am so I headed home to attend to other matters. While down there I stood around with a couple of other locals watching surfers and people playing with dogs on the beach while having flashes of the images from the Indonesian tsunami and wondering whether I was a panic-ky girly man or just being sensible compared to all the other Aussies enjoying the ocean this Sunday morning.

There's something to be said for prudence.

On the other hand I came home to check the news feeds and saw hundreds of news items from the US. A small set of waves did hit Hawaii but the stories mushroomed into tales of emergency food buying and local panics. Its sad that some countries get no news about bad problems until it is too late and other get so much news that the news itself generates problems.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Australian Story Runs Again

Just got back from Sydney visiting my Dad who had a health scare to find that over 300 people have visited the site in the last hour due to a rerun of the Australian Story episode called "The Big Deal" talking about the struggle with Microsoft. I've also been so privileged to get a lot of wonderful comments on the site about the show and the website... click on the Australian Story icon above to look at articles relating to the show... its a real buzz to think so many fellow Aussies relate to our story... thanks for visiting. Ric